
By Any Means Review: Mark Wahlberg and Yahya Abdul-Mateen II Take on a Corrupt System
By Any Means shook me a little more than I expected.
Going into the film, I thought we would see more resistance from the local community against the mobs and the people who seemed to have so much control over the town. Instead, the movie creates an uncomfortable picture of a community living under fear, where corruption runs deep and getting answers can be just as difficult as solving the murder itself.
The film, directed by Elegance Bratton, is inspired by the 1966 murder of civil rights leader Vernon Dahmer, played by Giancarlo Esposito. Dahmer was a Mississippi civil rights activist and NAACP leader who fought for voting rights before his home was attacked by members of the Ku Klux Klan. His story gives the film its historical foundation, but By Any Means takes that history and builds a fictional crime thriller around it.
RELATED:Brad Pitt Is Back as Cliff Booth — And This Time, David Fincher Is Calling the Shots
Mark Wahlberg plays Gregory Scarpa, a Mafia hitman who was secretly working as an FBI informant. That was one of the more unexpected parts of the movie for me. The FBI brings Scarpa into the investigation because conventional methods are not getting the answers they need. Instead of another agent walking into town with a badge and a notebook, they bring in someone who understands intimidation and violence from a completely different world.

Scarpa becomes the muscle of the investigation, and Wahlberg plays him with an attitude that makes it clear he is not interested in asking politely. He is willing to push people, threaten them and cross boundaries that traditional law enforcement cannot. It creates a strange situation where the FBI is depending on a Mafia hitman to accomplish what its own system has been unable to do. That decision also becomes one of the film’s biggest moral questions. How far can you go in the name of justice before you become part of the same problem you are trying to stop.
Yahya Abdul-Mateen II plays Special Agent Wayne Strider, a Black FBI agent assigned to the investigation. Unlike Scarpa, Strider is trying to navigate the case while also dealing with the reality of being a Black federal agent in Mississippi during the 1960s.
RELATED:Mayday Review: Ryan Reynolds and Kenneth Branagh Are a Perfectly Unexpected Pair
His position puts him in an uncomfortable place. He has the authority of the FBI behind him, but that does not mean everyone around him respects that authority. As the investigation develops, the pressure begins to affect more than just the case. His family eventually becomes caught up in the danger, raising the personal stakes for Strider.
I think the pairing of Scarpa and Strider is where the movie finds its strongest dynamic. They are completely different people, and neither one approaches justice the same way. Scarpa is willing to use fear to get results, while Strider is forced to consider what those methods could cost. The movie also does a good job of making the investigation feel bigger than the people directly involved. The corruption surrounding the town creates an environment where people are afraid to speak, law enforcement cannot always be trusted and violence can reach innocent people who have nothing to do with the original crime.

I kept waiting for more people to come together and push back against the people controlling the town. Instead, there is a feeling of isolation. Everyone seems to understand that something is wrong, but fear keeps people from standing together. The lack of unity makes the story feel even more frustrating because you can see how easily a broken system can continue when people are too afraid to challenge it. And then you have Scarpa walking into that environment and making everything even more unpredictable.
His presence adds another layer to the story because he is technically helping the FBI, but he is still a criminal. The movie does not ask you to forget who he is just because he happens to be working on the right side of an investigation. In some ways, that makes his character more interesting. He is helping expose corruption while using methods that are corrupt in their own right.

RELATED: LANTERNS Episode 3 Will Change How You See John Stewart
For me, that is where By Any Means becomes more than just a murder investigation.It is a movie about what happens when the system is already broken and the people trying to fix it are willing to break even more rules to get results.
Giancarlo Esposito’s performance as Vernon Dahmer gives the story its emotional connection to the real events. Knowing that Dahmer’s fight for voting rights was real makes the violence surrounding his story hit differently. The fictional elements surrounding the investigation allow the movie to explore the fear, tension and moral compromises that existed during that period without presenting every character as a direct historical recreation.
Wahlberg and Abdul-Mateen II also work well together because there is a natural tension between their characters. Their partnership is not built on trust right away. It develops because they realize they need each other if they are going to get closer to the truth. What stayed with me after By Any Means was not simply the question of who was responsible for the murder. It was the uncomfortable feeling that justice sometimes becomes complicated when the people looking for answers have to operate inside a system that is already compromised.

The film made me want more from the community. I wanted to see people unite, fight back and refuse to let fear control them. Instead, the movie shows how corruption and intimidation can keep people divided. And maybe that is exactly why the film shook me. By Any Means does not present justice as something clean or simple. Sometimes the people searching for it have to make difficult choices, and sometimes those choices create even more problems along the way. By the end, I was left thinking less about finding the perfect hero and more about how difficult it can be to uncover the truth when almost everyone has something to lose.








